Frank Gaffney on the CCP in Geneva

  • Join War Room Forum!

    Welcome Deplorable! Please take a moment to Sign Up for a free account so you can join in on the LIVE CHAT and forum DISCUSSIONS.

    Sign Up    Live Chat Login


realgeterdone

Senior Member
War Room VIP Member
Mar 6, 2021
2,152
781
113
81
Indiana
That is why we don`t need to be joining hands with any world organization. NATO, UN, WHO and the list goes on. The Geneva convention tied our hands in war and it hampered our ability to win this happened after WWII and we have had compromises ever since. We have north and south Korea, Vietnam, and mix and match here and there. My old pastor was in the second world war, he aid when they started through a town they dropped leaflets that told them they were coming through and when they did they didn`t leave a wall standing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NvEric

UpLateAgain

Member
Jun 23, 2021
44
34
18
The WHO cannot take ANY sovereignty from us by declaration. And Biden cannot give it away. That requires us giving it up by treaty, and that requires a supermajority ratification by the Senate. These guys have it exactly backwards. The Senate doesn't have to take action to stop it. It has no affect on us in law unless the Senate affirmatively agrees to it. It makes no difference what Biden agrees-to. It's like when Bill Clinton signed the Tokyo Accords on climate change. The Senate never ratified it, so it never has ANY affect in law on us. It would be the same here. Without Senate supermajority (2/3) ratification, the WHO can declare anything it wants-to, and it is for us 100% irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NvEric

UniqueCritique

Senior Member
Jan 28, 2021
1,782
1,530
113
Thanks for info. There is already a treaty every country has together with the WHO. I don't remember the name, but the U.S. (WE) ASKED FOR THIS MEETING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE TREATY!!! This was initiated by the U.S. Someone is trying to get rid of our sovereignty through this and FORGOT TO TELL us!
It fits right in with the s. border invasion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NvEric

UpLateAgain

Member
Jun 23, 2021
44
34
18
It matters not who REQUESTS a treaty be amended. You can't just ratify a treaty with another party, then have the other party to the treaty amend it, and say that is now the way it is. Biden is requesting the amendments, but it is the WHO that is doing the actual amending. And that means the current treatywhich we previously ratified is no longer acceptable to the WHO. THEY would be the ones breaking the old treaty and demanding a different set of terms be put into effect. A treaty is a contract. Change the terms of a contract, and you are effectively voiding the old contract and replacing it with a new one. Both parties to it have to agree to the changes, or one party is breaking the contract... which nullifies the other party's requirement to comply with it. And under the Constitution, the Executive Branch (Biden) can negotiate treaties, but they have no effexct in law unless and until the Senate ratifies them. I contend that the WHO can pass these amendments to its charter, but our Senate would have to approve the new contract before we'd have ANY obligation to comply with it. Biden be damned....

In short, Biden simply doesn't have the authority to amend treaties on behalf of the US. That is 100% the province of the Senate. He can request changes all day, but until the Senate ratifies any changes that are made, they have no meaning for us whatsoever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NvEric

NvEric

Senior Member
Feb 7, 2021
2,866
2,293
113
Nevada, near Carson City
Who will enforce what WHO says ?
Every law requires someone to enforce it.
Far too often people go through life on auto-pilot.
Our system requires people to obey.
Mostly that's a good idea, but not when the 2020 election was fraud filled and a Junta seized the White House.
Biden simply doesn't have the authority to amend treaties on behalf of the US.
Right.

The era of presidential dictatorship must end and the People need not rely on elections, amendments, or other. We can make new government if We so choose. This is our way as is going by the current laws. If the laws are broken and no one, who's job it is to enforce them - Congress, decides to do nothing, then the People can bypass them and make new government.

The harmful and radical disruption to our system, for so many decades, must be broken - thrown away - and a new one made.
 

UpLateAgain

Member
Jun 23, 2021
44
34
18
Who will enforce what WHO says ?
Every law requires someone to enforce it.
Far too often people go through life on auto-pilot.
Our system requires people to obey.
Mostly that's a good idea, but not when the 2020 election was fraud filled and a Junta seized the White House.

Right.

The era of presidential dictatorship must end and the People need not rely on elections, amendments, or other. We can make new government if We so choose. This is our way as is going by the current laws. If the laws are broken and no one, who's job it is to enforce them - Congress, decides to do nothing, then the People can bypass them and make new government.

The harmful and radical disruption to our system, for so many decades, must be broken - thrown away - and a new one made.
Dr. Breggin said it was a myth that the Senate had to approve our supposed give away of our sovereignty. Lee's see. Who do I believe? Dr. Breggin, or the US Constitution? Gee that's a tough one all right.

I'm going with the Constitution! A treaty is a contract between the US government and some other incorporated entity. It can be a tribe, another government, or even an NGO like the WHO. But it remains a contract. And like all contracts, it has terms. And like all contracts, one side cannot modify those terms. Both sides have to agree to the new terms for them to have effect in law or for obligations created by the new terms to have effect. And the governmental entity in our country that agrees to terms in a treaty is the Senate. Nobody else in government has that authority. Nobody. Not the President, Not the House, not HHS. Nobody. The Senate. That's it. Period. Breggen says if the WHO changes its understanding of how it can operate by amending its charter, and declares an emergency in the US that we don't comply-with, the WHO can bring the UN into forcing compliance. GIVE ME A BREAK. UN Troops going to come in and take over? That would be a hoot watching that attempt. World Bank going to threaten to cut us off if we don't comply? Here's a news flash. We don't get money from the world bank. We supply it to them. I guess if the world bank wants to refuse to accept our donations, I can live with that.

In short, there is no POSSIBLE way for us to lose any sovereignty to the WHO without us choosing by Senate ratification by a 2/3 supermajority to give it up. Can Biden agree with the WHO when they declare an emergency and declare one in the US? Sure. But he can do that now. The proposed amendments to the WHO's operating procedures aren't going to affect that one way or the other. There is simply no way we can be forced under law to comply with the WHO's dictates unless the Senate, by a 2/3 vote, agrees to new treaty obligations.

Bannon is telling the War Room Posse to write protests en masse opposing Biden's WHO amendment proposal. Here's another news flash. We could write a BILLION letters of protest, and as Naomi Wolfe said, it is not going to make any difference. The WHO is going to agree to the amendments Biden has proposed, and tell the world it now has the ability to require everyone to conform to its whims. And that won't make the slightest difference one way or they other. Because Biden will comply with their whims if he wants-to whether the new amendments are adopted or not, and if we don't want to comply, we can tell them, GFU, and there isn't a damned thing they can do about it, and we would not even be violating our word or commitment, because the new treaty (and if they change the terms, it IS a new treaty) was never ratified by the Senate.

This is all much ado about nothing; a tempest in a teapot; the War Room jumping the shark. And after the 2022 election, Biden isn't going to be worrying about whether or not he's complying with the whims of the WHO anyway. He'll be too busy fretting over his sure to be occurring upcoming Impeachment.
 


War Room Forum
Donate to War Room Forum
Donations pay for increased server capacity, Live Chat and our support staff to post news and video clips throughout the day.

Hey Deplorable! Join us...

Never miss out. Join in on all that our community as to offer!

Sign Me Up!

Trending Today

War Room Podcast

War Room Live Chat